Which term is appropriate instead of "AIDS carrier"?

Using "Person with AIDS" is appropriate because it emphasizes the individual first, rather than defining them solely by their health condition. This person-first language respects the dignity and humanity of individuals living with HIV/AIDS. It acknowledges that they are more than their diagnosis, fostering a perspective that values their identity beyond just their health status.

The other terms, while technically describing the condition, can inadvertently contribute to stigma. "AIDS infected individual" uses a medicalized and detached language, focusing on the infection rather than the person. "Person suffering with AIDS" implies a state of constant suffering, which can perpetuate misconceptions about living with the condition. "AIDS patient" might reduce the individual to just a label, ignoring their other roles and identities in life. Overall, person-first language encourages a more compassionate and accurate understanding of those living with HIV/AIDS.